Jump to content

kowenicki

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    11,584
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kowenicki

  1. Ok, ok, put your handbags down ladies. I realise I have had a go at your man crush but your adoration simply isnt reciprocated by him... such is life. Sheridan did a good job for us and it was mutually beneficial. His stature was given a new shine after doing good work here and he used it to take a higher paid job. Don't forget, prior to coming back to Latics Sheridan had taken the Newport job after wanting to move back North!? Which bit of this don't you agree with? On Johnson, its hilarious people think we 'sold' him. Grow up. He wanted to leave in his quest to be a prem manager (which he may well achieve), we recieved compensation, there is a difference. On a more general note. Its amazing how certain posters embrace negative rumours based on nothing and no actual event or information from an unnamed source as fact. When someone else has an opinion based on events that have taken place they should stfu. Angry little souls.
  2. No, I'm not guilty for f a t a lot. These are fecking obvious. Evans wanted Forest job, CLEARLY more money. People need to wake up to what footballers and managers are. They, rightly, go to the money. Sherudan doesn't give a flying :censored: about Latics. His loyalty and love is to Sheff Wed. Sheridan went to work with a mate who will have offered more, no other explanation for dropping a league to a club in worse financial shape than even we are. Karma is a bitch. County are in trouble, winding up orders and dropping down toward non league oblivion.
  3. The two positions are not mutually exclusive. Shez went for money 100% and Evans wanted the Forest job. Looks like it may backfire on Shez and it did backfire on Evans. Good.
  4. Great point. I can feel an improvement coming. Honestly I can.
  5. I'd love to know how many times we have hit the bar/post this season.
  6. Jesus Christ. We have totally dominated this game. Apparently second goal shouldn't have been disallowed.
  7. Dominating the first half again. Score ffs!
  8. So you have time to meet and be all hard with a fellow fan but not to have a grown up conversation with the chairman. Figures.
  9. Hmmm. Bit of a cop out that tbh. Bit weak tbh. Not a surprise though. It's the nature of the internet troll.
  10. Not remotely childish, the opposite actually. He is man enough to have a face to face.... are those mentioned man enough too?
  11. I'm expecting to see them all on latics player soon, why wouldn't they step up?
  12. Absolutely no basis or evidence for this rumour is there? The Dale forum is awash with holier than thou pious posters who have a real downer on Bury and less so Oldham, sneering our way on a regular basis. Many of them still think it's Clarkes fault that their lovely young man up front committed assault. Their club never does anything wrong, their players are all angels, Hill is a lovely modest man and their explayers all want to come back to Spotland for their last season. Deluded. Pinch of salt
  13. Not misleading at all. We aren't a hire and fire club. Never have been. If the table was for turnover of managers it would obviously look different. But that is sometimes the clubs fault and sometimes the fault of managers on a career charge regardless of loyalty or professionalism.
  14. The main three for me were Dieng, Palmer and Gerrard. Two of which we couldnt have kept regardless of our approach. Palmer wasn't ours and Dieng was in demand. The other has been replaced by arguably a better player. A punt on Main too, but I fear he wouldn't have delivered longer term. He was out to prove a point.
  15. I'd need a manifesto before I'd sign up. Yes I'm serious. If this is to be done it needs to be done properly or forget it.
  16. Well, technically we did score. The linesman just wasn't paying attention. Ta love.
×
×
  • Create New...