4froale Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 http://qprreport.blogspot.com/2007/05/oldh...z-explains.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcprozac Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 (edited) http://qprreport.blogspot.com/2007/05/oldh...z-explains.html It was public knowledge at the time mate - despite the fact that £500k may have been enough to secure auto in May 2007. Strange affair but it's in the past now. Perhaps we should look forward not back. Blitz is now in the past and we have the future waiting in the wings...(I hope!) Edited July 7, 2010 by oafcprozac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4froale Posted July 7, 2010 Author Share Posted July 7, 2010 ah i dont know how i didnt hear about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Ritchie Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 It was a personal loan though so he probably calculated that he would get it back with a bit more on top. Wonder if he has had any of it back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcprozac Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 It was a personal loan though so he probably calculated that he would get it back with a bit more on top. Wonder if he has had any of it back? It was supposedly paid back within weeks I seem to recall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lags Posted July 8, 2010 Share Posted July 8, 2010 Didn't the football authorities step in and told QPR (or their director involved) to pay the money back as it wasn't above board in the first place. Well not above board as such but not allowed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza699 Posted July 8, 2010 Share Posted July 8, 2010 I didnt know about this either Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted July 8, 2010 Share Posted July 8, 2010 Didn't the football authorities step in and told QPR (or their director involved) to pay the money back as it wasn't above board in the first place. Well not above board as such but not allowed. That's how I remember it too. Nothing to do with him spending more or less on Latics anyway, he was doing it to make a fat profit, which was all to our benefit as we wanted him to find cash to spend on us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
creepy Posted July 8, 2010 Share Posted July 8, 2010 Didn't the football authorities step in and told QPR (or their director involved) to pay the money back as it wasn't above board in the first place. Well not above board as such but not allowed. they payed it back straight away yes scroll to the bottom - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/...n-FA-probe.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.