Crusoe Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Wouldn't read too much in - basically same as last year with the blanks filled in. Suspect it means one-in, one-out from now on. 01 Brill 02 03 Jacobson 04 Worthington 05 Holdsworth 06 Hazell 07 Jones 08 Smalley 09 Abbott 10 Purdie 11 Jarrett 12 Lomax 13 Fleming 14 Furman 15 Alessandra 16 Gregan 17 Feeney 18 Taylor 19 Lee 20 Stephens 21 Black 22 Brooke 23 Ollerenshaw 24 Millar 25 Colbeck 26 Bembo-Leta 27 McGrath 28 Eaves 29 Dickov 30 Fodor 31 Floszmann Possibly a new number two signing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beag_teeets Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Possibly a new number two signing? Haven't we had enough of those over recent years? I'm here all week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Latics_Fanatic Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Wouldn't read too much in - basically same as last year with the blanks filled in. Suspect it means one-in, one-out from now on. 01 Brill 02 03 Jacobson 04 Worthington 05 Holdsworth 06 Hazell 07 Jones 08 Smalley 09 Abbott 10 Purdie 11 Jarrett 12 Lomax 13 Fleming 14 Furman 15 Alessandra 16 Gregan 17 Feeney 18 Taylor 19 Lee 20 Stephens 21 Black 22 Brooke 23 Ollerenshaw 24 Millar 25 Colbeck 26 Bembo-Leta 27 McGrath 28 Eaves 29 Dickov 30 Fodor 31 Floszmann Possibly a new number two signing? Least someone better gets this legendary number this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza699 Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Least someone better gets this legendary number this year. I can see it now . "your not fit to wear that number Eaves" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkenyonqfc2 Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Wouldn't read too much in - basically same as last year with the blanks filled in. Suspect it means one-in, one-out from now on. 01 Brill 02 03 Jacobson 04 Worthington 05 Holdsworth 06 Hazell 07 Jones 08 Smalley 09 Abbott 10 Purdie 11 Jarrett 12 Lomax 13 Fleming 14 Furman 15 Alessandra 16 Gregan 17 Feeney 18 Taylor 19 Lee 20 Stephens 21 Black 22 Brooke 23 Ollerenshaw 24 Millar 25 Colbeck 26 Bembo-Leta 27 McGrath 28 Eaves 29 Dickov 30 Fodor 31 Floszmann Possibly a new number two signing? lee offered no.2 but chose to keep his own no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Latics_Fanatic Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 I can see it now . "your not fit to wear that number Eaves" sorry i meant he's better than Colbeck wearing it, least Eavesy shows that he wants to play for the bloody club! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobOAFC Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Latics Fanatic, How come you crossed furman out of the list? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy_Fent Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 sorry i meant he's better than Colbeck wearing it, least Eavesy shows that he wants to play for the bloody club! it's not that Colbeck doesn't try, it's just that he has no footballing ability whatsoever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 31 Floszmann Perhaps someone can enlighten me on his Latics career so far ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusoe Posted July 26, 2010 Author Share Posted July 26, 2010 One of the "international superstar development squad wonders" from last season. He and Fodor stayed when the others decided they'd rather go home. Played for the ressies only, not even on the bench for the first team. He and Fodor are on loan for another season. Not quite sure why, but I doubt it's costing us much (or anything at all, if it's for their clubs to acclimatise/showcase them). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackey Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 31 Floszmann Perhaps someone can enlighten me on his Latics career so far ? Uneventful aside from one astonishing save last season just before Christmas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Latics_Fanatic Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Latics Fanatic, How come you crossed furman out of the list? Transfer Listed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusoe Posted July 27, 2010 Author Share Posted July 27, 2010 Furman? I thought it was just Fleming, Lomax, Jacobson, Worthington, Colbeck and Purdie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernie For England Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 Transfer Listed He isn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lags Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 He isn't. Yet !!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernie For England Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 Yet !!!! I'd be disappointed if he was. I think he'll be much improved this season if the team is playing in a different style than under Penney. The Rangers fans weren't happy when he was allowed to leave so i've got faith in him yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshy Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 I'd be disappointed if he was. I think he'll be much improved this season if the team is playing in a different style than under Penney. The Rangers fans weren't happy when he was allowed to leave so I've got faith in him yet. +1 I'm sure allot of players especially attacking will be better this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.