LaticsPete Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 (edited) Perfectly positioned to see that there was no foul on Tim Howard. http://www.telegraph...l?frame=2483459 (Shame the Telegraph thought that Smith had scored twice!!) Edited February 18, 2013 by LaticsPete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laticsrblue Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 I think Moyes was complaining that there was a foul on him during the previous corner so the goal scoring one shouldn't have been given. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lukers1 Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Yep, took up a good position.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24hoursfromtulsehill Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Still a bit on the fussy side for my tastes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc_lover Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 I think Moyes was complaining that there was a foul on him during the previous corner so the goal scoring one shouldn't have been given. This is correct, yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 This is correct, yes. He was also complaining that Bouzanis throwing his hands up distracted Howard and that that should have been a foul too, even though he didn't touch the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laticsrblue Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 He's a big Mary Ann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc_lover Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 He was also complaining that Bouzanis throwing his hands up distracted Howard and that that should have been a foul too, even though he didn't touch the ball. I see, didn't hear this. If he did the bloke is a fool. I'm sure he knows the rules and nowhere does it state that jumping with your arms aloft is a foul! Would have thought referees would prefer this as its better than having his arms wrapped around their defenders. The replays show just how good a job we did on the corner. From blocking their runners, to hassling their keeper, to simply waving arms in the air to block their defenders sight of the ball. It paid off and we got the equaliser which we fully deserved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Still a bit on the fussy side for my tastes. I’d like to think that was a pun on Maurice Fussey, the high-stepping referee whose charges up and down the pitch were an entertainment in themselves. He would sprint with his knees going at full right angles every stride towards the goal line. He then did the same back to the half-way line if a goal kick ensued from the corner. The crowds used to cheer him every time. However, you’re probably too young to remember him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twisbrogan Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Having been seemingly so ineffective at corner for years, I like this new technique of packing the 6 yard box, swing the corner inwards and get Smith to charge into the whole melee to knock anything and everything into the back of the net. Hoping, of course, that the ball is collected somewhere along the way and that once various bodies are removed the referee can see that it (or what remains of it) has crossed the line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 I see, didn't hear this. If he did the bloke is a fool. I'm sure he knows the rules and nowhere does it state that jumping with your arms aloft is a foul! Would have thought referees would prefer this as its better than having his arms wrapped around their defenders. The replays show just how good a job we did on the corner. From blocking their runners, to hassling their keeper, to simply waving arms in the air to block their defenders sight of the ball. It paid off and we got the equaliser which we fully deserved. I was under the impression years ago that goalkeepers had to wear, not only a different colour but also long sleeves, so that in a situation like the Smith goal, the ref can see whose arms are reaching up to touch the ball, but apparently it has never been in the laws of the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Having been seemingly so ineffective at corner for years, I like this new technique of packing the 6 yard box, swing the corner inwards and get Smith to charge into the whole melee to knock anything and everything into the back of the net. Hoping, of course, that the ball is collected somewhere along the way and that once various bodies are removed the referee can see that it (or what remains of it) has crossed the line. I've been yelling for this for ages. Having watched our players being held, jostled and trying to jump from a standing position, it's much more effective to be attacking the ball from an aerial position. Smith said they'd practised it all week - well done TP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laticdickovarmy Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 What hasnt been mentioned is Grounds delivery for the goal was bang on the money Baxters delivery was poor by his standards Saturday but Grounds got it spot on, had the ball not been put there we wouldnt be talking of going to Goodison Park but the poor defending and goalkeeping that led to Jagelika heading them in front Still buzzing after Saturday, would love there to have been a camera in both dressing rooms ala Rugby after the game to see the difference in emotions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcmetty Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 I was under the impression years ago that goalkeepers had to wear, not only a different colour but also long sleeves, so that in a situation like the Smith goal, the ref can see whose arms are reaching up to touch the ball, but apparently it has never been in the laws of the game. Don't the gloves sort of give it away? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaskedOwl Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 i thought the ref give us nothing all game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Don't the gloves sort of give it away? Prior to the 1970s, gloves were rarely worn by keepers, but now it's not only keepers who wear gloves. Keepers used to wear caps to keep the sun out of their eyes, something that would make sense if done nowadays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlayItLivo Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 I see, didn't hear this. If he did the bloke is a fool. I'm sure he knows the rules and nowhere does it state that jumping with your arms aloft is a foul! Would have thought referees would prefer this as its better than having his arms wrapped around their defenders. The replays show just how good a job we did on the corner. From blocking their runners, to hassling their keeper, to simply waving arms in the air to block their defenders sight of the ball. It paid off and we got the equaliser which we fully deserved. Moyes mentioned one or two things but was quick to mention we also deserved a replay. He didn't really complain at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.