MAC0AFC Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 I'd rather be playing Saturday / Sunday without a midweek trip to Belarus or similar to play in a :censored: competition. he's not playing saturday/sunday/monday/tuesday/wednesday (whenever they play games in the PL) anymore though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 I'd rather be playing Saturday / Sunday without a midweek trip to Belarus or similar to play in a :censored: competition. Didn't you enjoy the Latics trips to Ancona and Genoa in 1995? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 Didn't you enjoy the Latics trips to Ancona and Genoa in 1995? I was skint in 1995 and wasn't attending any football! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz_Oafc Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 My step dad has just told me that an alleged "in the know" city fan on their bluemoon forum insists that the Richards sell on was settled a few seasons ago when we were struggling to pay wages ect. And they paid us £750k. No idea how genuine he is but apparently he gets inside info on transfers ect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddySmoker Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 My step dad has just told me that an alleged "in the know" city fan on their bluemoon forum insists that the Richards sell on was settled a few seasons ago when we were struggling to pay wages ect. And they paid us £750k. No idea how genuine he is but apparently he gets inside info on transfers ect. You should always ignore info from friends of friends of cousins twice removed. Especially if the source claims 'inside info.' Corney has said it has not been setlled! How about asking Barry at the forthcoming Trust meeting? 'Micah who?' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted June 3, 2014 Author Share Posted June 3, 2014 My step dad has just told me that an alleged "in the know" city fan on their bluemoon forum insists that the Richards sell on was settled a few seasons ago when we were struggling to pay wages ect. And they paid us £750k. No idea how genuine he is but apparently he gets inside info on transfers ect. Ffs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusoe Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Etc. Not ect. (Sorry. Very pedantic. I'll downvote meself.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keepingthe Faith Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Etc. Not ect. (Sorry. Very pedantic. I'll downvote meself.) Shocking mistake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 I'm against any form of censorship but, could we have some kind of sin bin/OWTB jail where anybody who suggests the sell on clause has already been bought out isn't allowed to post for 24 hours? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddySmoker Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 (edited) I'm against any form of censorship but, could we have some kind of sin bin/OWTB jail where anybody who suggests the sell on clause has already been bought out isn't allowed to post for 24 YEARS? At the least! Edited June 3, 2014 by ChaddySmoker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz_Oafc Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Feck me, i was only posting what some alleged 'itk' has posted on city's forum. (It is on there btw, I've checked and he posted it today). Apparently sjk2008 posts on there so maybe he could let us know how reliable the guy is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Shocking mistake Doff of the cap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted June 11, 2014 Author Share Posted June 11, 2014 Today ...it's West Ham http://metro.co.uk/2014/06/10/west-ham-target-manchester-citys-wantaway-defender-micah-richards-4757279/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WIZZO83 Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 More likely half will go to TTA to pay off some of their directors loan and the rest on the stand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 More likely half will go to TTA to pay off some of their directors loan and the rest on the stand Nowt wrong with that, the sooner they are paid off the better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beag_teeets Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Citeh only need 5 homegrowners rather than 8: http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/jun/11/manchester-city-champions-league-home-grown-players?CMP=twt_gu Come on City, sell the :censored:. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 I'm against any form of censorship but, could we have some kind of sin bin/OWTB jail where anybody who suggests the sell on clause has already been bought out isn't allowed to post for 24 hours? As long as the Grammar Marxists get double, I'm in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted June 11, 2014 Author Share Posted June 11, 2014 As long as the Grammar Marxists get double, I'm in. By Marxists I trust you mean those who believe in a society of equality, where there is a sharing of wealth and opportunity, and where the common good comes first. So I don't see why they should be punished .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simoncorneyisgod Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 According to the transfer expert on talksh**e the West Ham link is rubbish however Micah has confirmed his desire to leave but Citeh may not sell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lukers1 Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Nowt wrong with that, the sooner they are paid off the better. Yes, no time like the present... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 By Marxists I trust you mean those who believe in a society of equality, where there is a sharing of wealth and opportunity, and where the common good comes first. So I don't see why they should be punished ....For incessant spouting of idealistic bollocks which flies in the face of human nature? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 We should all be as grammatically :censored: as each other? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markspark92 Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Seen Michah at Parklife festival on weekend said he'll be signing for Arsenal in this transfer window Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Latics_Fanatic Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Seen Michah at Parklife festival on weekend said he'll be signing for Arsenal in this transfer window Hopefully that will be that and we'll never have the discussion of Micah Richards again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlossopLatic Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 More likely half will go to TTA to pay off some of their directors loan and the rest on the stand You mean like last year when we made over £1million in additional FA cup money? It will pay for the stand and next seasons running losses nothingelse! Unless the club starts making a very healthy profit such as getting to the PL these loans won't be being touched Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.