Jump to content

New midfielder


Recommended Posts

What about if they're thrown straight in ala Petrasso and lads that have been here months chomping at the bit and don't get a chance? That's going to create issues. You can't please all of the people all of the time but what about giving a few a chance first then go into the market if they don't take their chance. I see this as signing people for the sake of it 'just in case'. Even if we get injuries there's enough depth in the squad to compensate with some very good youngsters who could be short-term stop gap.

but petrasso won us the game, so that's different - then he had an awful half hour at shrewsbury and was replaced - LJ again proving he's not another dickov!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes he won us the game, but did very little all game. The manager was already looking to sub him because of his all round minimal contribution. Nothing against the lad, he's simply not ready for the rigours of league one. In all honesty he shouldn't have started at Shrewsbury, only doing so as the manager thought JCH was bollocksed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes he won us the game, but did very little all game. The manager was already looking to sub him because of his all round minimal contribution. Nothing against the lad, he's simply not ready for the rigours of league one. In all honesty he shouldn't have started at Shrewsbury, only doing so as the manager thought JCH was bollocksed.

 

 

Which he was, but Sidney should have started instead. I agree on the whole about loan players coming in. Even with our current injuries a centre mid isn't what we need - we have Smith, Wes and Rodgers as clear first teamers and Winchester and Mellor as capable understudies (albeit possibly used elsewhere to plug gaps as well). Petrasso was a strange one at the time for me, now with montano out it makes sense to have somebody as backup on the wing but from the 2 performances so far he should be behind Dayton, Sidney, Winchester, Millar (now injured short term) and Philly (as required) for a starting place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes he won us the game, but did very little all game. The manager was already looking to sub him because of his all round minimal contribution. Nothing against the lad, he's simply not ready for the rigours of league one. In all honesty he shouldn't have started at Shrewsbury, only doing so as the manager thought JCH was bollocksed.

i totally agree, but without him there we'd of white possibly drew 0-0, so we'll have to let him off for gillingham - shrewsbury on the other hand has proved he's not quite ready and shouldn't be starting against bradford!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...