jsslatic Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 Kelly is a good player, and would be shame to lose him. But we have lost better players in the past and moved on! Moved on to what? We're still here twenty years later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 Yeah, that run of three wins in fifteen games has no doubt convinced him that there's no better place to be.don't forget the shocking negative tactics too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldhamoafc Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 Moved on to what? We're still here twenty years later. Maybe wrong choice of words. But we haven't gone bump or been relegated and found reasonable replacements for our budget. Losing Kelly won't be the end of the world... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Burns Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 All depends on what the new manager thinks he can do with the money Errrr... OK, yeah. Sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted May 19, 2015 Author Share Posted May 19, 2015 Maybe wrong choice of words. But we haven't gone bump or been relegated and found reasonable replacements for our budget. Losing Kelly won't be the end of the world... The Blues aren't going bump The Blues aren't going bump And now you're gonna believe us And now you're gonna believe us We haven't been relegated either The blues aren't going bump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsslatic Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Maybe wrong choice of words. But we haven't gone bump or been relegated and found reasonable replacements for our budget. Losing Kelly won't be the end of the world... Unless, heaven forfend, we actually want to do something one season. I'm not saying we don't sell him if finances dictate (which I anticipate they will) but let's not pretend it's a scenario which has or will ever be anything other than a backward step on the pitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimsleftfoot Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Its the lowest common denominator that LJ be linked with the star of his previous club. However, if there is someone else available where he doesn't need to pay a transfer fee, he might not go for Kelly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L1onheartNew Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 which Kelly is LJ in for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 which Kelly is LJ in for? Darren. As Under 5's coach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 He's now in an arm wrestle with Rotherham over a keeper .... http://footballleagueworld.co.uk/rotherham-united-set-to-rival-barnsley-in-fight-for-24-year-old-star/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.