adamoafc Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 While I'm not Burgess's biggest fan he does what he does adequately most of the time. He won't & shouldn't drop him at the moment. ?? adequately? The lad is 6ft 4 and can't challenge a man for headers as he doesn't get off the floor! Adequately is what has us in this situation. Wilson all day for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Latics_Fanatic Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Team I think Robinson will pick... Ripley Dummigan Burgess Clarke Wilson Flynn Fane Banks McLaughlin McKay Erwin Subs: Kettings Law Dunne Green Croft Winchester Osei Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 ?? adequately? The lad is 6ft 4 and can't challenge a man for headers as he doesn't get off the floor! Adequately is what has us in this situation. Wilson all day for me. He's done fine for the most part, some of the stick he's had has been over the top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 My team would be Ripley Dummigan Clarke Burgess Dunne Winchester Fane Croft Green Flynn Any one of four up front to be replaced when they start doing there own thing. Instruct Fane and Green to offload a simple pass to the nearest blue shirt when in possession. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejh45 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 My team would be Ripley Dummigan Clarke Burgess Dunne Winchester Fane Croft Green Flynn Any one of four up front to be replaced when they start doing there own thing. Instruct Fane and Green to offload a simple pass to the nearest blue shirt when in possession. On the evidence of what makes you put Winchester in instead of McLaughlin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 We seemed to do ok when Klok was playing even if he isn't much of a player himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejh45 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 We seemed to do ok when Klok was playing even if he isn't much of a player himself. Should have been considered for Monday....at least he would have shown some fight. But Robinson's use of him has me confused...he was signed to play central midfield (or so I thought) but has generally been pushed out wide!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusoe Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Klok is, and has been, injured. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcfluff1985 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Should have been considered for Monday....at least he would have shown some fight. But Robinson's use of him has me confused...he was signed to play central midfield (or so I thought) but has generally been pushed out wide!!! He's been out and still is with a calf injury I think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stagger Lee Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 We seemed to do ok when Klok was playing even if he isn't much of a player himself. He would have been perfect for the Lincoln game, a bit of mongrel rather than another midfield pansy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 He would have been perfect for the Lincoln game, a bit of mongrel rather than another midfield pansy. Yeah, he at least puts himself about and gets around the pitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Klok is, and has been, injured. On the bench vs Port Vale, he might be injured again though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flemboy Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Lord knows why but I'm off down to Oxford. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 From Matt Chambers; Bit of team news for Oxford tomorrow: Freddie Ladapo "very doubtful" with knee/shin splints problem. Mark Klok (calf) is out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Bit of team news for Oxford. Freddie Ladapo is doubtful - last seen in Luke Waterfalls back pocket. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
losesome Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 From Matt Chambers; Bit of team news for Oxford tomorrow: Freddie Ladapo "very doubtful" with knee/shin splints problem. Mark Klok (calf) is out. The first part of the news is missing - Latics given boost - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flemboy Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 From Matt Chambers; Bit of team news for Oxford tomorrow: Freddie Ladapo "very doubtful" with knee/shin splints problem. Mark Klok (calf) is out. More likely backbone/spine deficiencies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_bro Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 SR says he's making changes after Lincoln. Does that mean the five changes he made are being reversed!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worcester Owl Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 I wasn't sure whether to turn up (live near Cheltenham so Oxford just down the A40) but the news that Ladapo is injured is a clincher - I'll be there and I'm taking my neighbour with me as an honorary Latics fan for the day. We can surely grind out a tedious 1-0 away win - and we need to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 We're in the Wetherspoons at the moment. It's quite small and fairly heaving, might not be ideal for tomorrow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OL9erlatic Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 More likely backbone/spine deficiencies Kudos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byrnes boots Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 The first part of the news is missing - Latics given boost - Whats the boost Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L1onheartNew Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 Whats the boost It's a chocolate bar that allows one to toss cabers in one's kilt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted December 10, 2016 Share Posted December 10, 2016 (edited) Teams; Take a look at @Matt_Chambers_'s Tweet: https://twitter.com/Matt_Chambers_/status/807586054366695424?s=09 Edited December 10, 2016 by BP1960 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewBlue Posted December 10, 2016 Author Share Posted December 10, 2016 Winchester and Reckord not in the squad. Ladapo neither, but he's supposedly injured.They were the two, clearly. Think both will be gone in January. Dummigan dropped and Green very fortunate to retain his place. Three centre mids and Mckay leading the line. Dylan King in the squad - must be a youth lad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.