Jump to content

Takeover / New Investment - What Rumours Have You Heard?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

There will be doubt about new investment up until the point its confirmed somehow - and not linked to the transfer restrictions so could go on beyond.

 

New signings are useful given the situation and as mostly loans always difficult to know the cost.  Some clubs will pay the wages to get them experience / or in the shop window so someone else might take them on in January - so not clear if the recent additions have changed our wage bill.

 

If they have, then given we were on an embargo it would indicated either money or players out that we don't yet know about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Kusunga_Is_God said:

from a distance it looks like the investment has fallen on its arse and Shez was given control again. 

Back to normal again and fighting for survival? 

However. In contrast there has been no outgoings. Sheridan and Moisley themselves said there had to be outgoings if we could afford anyone else. Then again these loans are only for 3 months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kusunga_Is_God said:

However. In contrast there has been no outgoings. Sheridan and Moisley themselves said there had to be outgoings if we could afford anyone else. Then again these loans are only for 3 months. 

 No outgoings announced doesn't mean there hasn't been. Be great to get rid of a couple of the baddies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Scapegoat said:

There will be doubt about new investment up until the point its confirmed somehow - and not linked to the transfer restrictions so could go on beyond.

 

New signings are useful given the situation and as mostly loans always difficult to know the cost.  Some clubs will pay the wages to get them experience / or in the shop window so someone else might take them on in January - so not clear if the recent additions have changed our wage bill.

 

If they have, then given we were on an embargo it would indicated either money or players out that we don't yet know about.

On previous latics history last season, the parent club paid their wages as per their agreed contract and then invoiced us....when we paid the parent club is another matter... Chris Taylor springs to mind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, josh_latics said:

Wonder if we'll send Wilson back. Although doubt we're paying him, Ruddy or Placide that much, having 3 senior keepers seems daft, especially when Shez occasionally didn't even put Kettings on the bench last season. 

 

 

I wouldn't have put Kettings on the bench if Ripley and all youth keepers had fallen foul of the Black Death... rather play Chaddy in goal 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...