spanishfly Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 1 hour ago, simplythemostimportantkick said: Substitute nephew for bloke in the pub.. that’s what a wise one would do. The blokes barmy af clearly. And a liar. yawn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Burns Posted March 11 Author Share Posted March 11 3 hours ago, simplythemostimportantkick said: Substitute nephew for bloke in the pub.. that’s what a wise one would do. The blokes barmy af clearly. And a liar. 'biggest attention seeker on the internet' 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythemostimportantkick Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 1 hour ago, spanishfly said: yawn. You Are Wiseowl No ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Burns Posted March 11 Author Share Posted March 11 15 minutes ago, simplythemostimportantkick said: You Are Wiseowl and Nonaenever ftfy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 6 hours ago, BP1960 said: My line up would be 442 with 2 wingers including one from the youths as I think he's good enough. I was referring to personnel, as you mentioned Mellon keeps picking the same players. I'm struggling to think who we have which will make a difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanishfly Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 26 minutes ago, simplythemostimportantkick said: You Are Wiseowl No ? 10 minutes ago, Monty Burns said: ftfy No, as I responded a while ago. No idea why I`ve been targetted but then again I`ve observed "OWTB hard men" ridicule a 70 odd year old bloke on here too. Bet they were typical bully boys at school too. Sad fucking place this. I`m not going to answer any more of your childish nonsense. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Burns Posted March 11 Author Share Posted March 11 knows a lot of back story for a new bloke this one when l said 'time for a new username' l was tryna show you it was stupid changing in the first place, not to actual do it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disjointed Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 25 minutes ago, Monty Burns said: knows a lot of back story for a new bloke this one when l said 'time for a new username' l was tryna show you it was stupid changing in the first place, not to actual do it Never change, be true to yourself and fuck everyone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Only Blue Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Well Halifax's loss is Hebden Bridge's gain. At least for the pub trade. A Latics away day without the Latics to break up the drinking will be a different experience Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 32 minutes ago, Only Blue said: Well Halifax's loss is Hebden Bridge's gain. At least for the pub trade. A Latics away day without the Latics to break up the drinking will be a different experience No football to spoil the day. If Carlsberg did away days... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 (edited) 17 hours ago, Wardie said: I was referring to personnel, as you mentioned Mellon keeps picking the same players. I'm struggling to think who we have which will make a difference. It's difficult I know but maybe 442 attacking; Instructions, compete, pass, move, create, score goals. Hudson Sachdev Sutton Raglan or Hobson Kitching Atherton Gardner Conlon Walker Fondop Garner or Norwood. Edited March 12 by BP1960 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobledgersheart Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 5 minutes ago, BP1960 said: It's difficult I know but maybe 442 attacking; Instructions, compete, pass, move, create, score goals. Hudson Sachdev Sutton Raglan or Hobson Kitching Atherton Gardner Conlon Walker Fondop Garner or Norwood. Well there'd certainly be plenty of goals if that team played ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc1955 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 (edited) A 4231 lineup……. Hudson Sutton Raglan Hobson Kitching Lundstram Conlon Dallas Hammond Walker Norwood Subs. Norman, Sheron, Ward, Garner, Hogan. Edited March 13 by oafc1955 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 5 minutes ago, Bobledgersheart said: Well there'd certainly be plenty of goals if that team played ! If I knew his email addy should I send it to MM? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigDog Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 17 minutes ago, BP1960 said: It's difficult I know but maybe 442 attacking; Instructions, compete, pass, move, create, score goals. Hudson Sachdev Sutton Raglan or Hobson Kitching Atherton Gardner Conlon Walker Fondop Garner or Norwood. How anyone can pick Sutton or Hobson at centre back over Hogan completely baffles me Playing as a centre back he has been by far the best of our back three. Shades of how it went with Piergianni towards the end… I wonder how he’s doing now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobledgersheart Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 7 minutes ago, BP1960 said: If I knew his email addy should I send it to MM? Probably, that line up won't have crossed his mind ! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddogs Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 51 minutes ago, oafc1955 said: A 4231 lineup……. Hudson Sutton Raglan Hobson Kitching Lundstram Conlon Dallas Hammond Walker Norwood Subs. Norman, Sheron, Ward, Garner, Hogan. Never going to drop his Captain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Ritchie Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Is Hope injured or just out of favour? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yarddog73 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 hour ago, TheBigDog said: How anyone can pick Sutton or Hobson at centre back over Hogan completely baffles me Playing as a centre back he has been by far the best of our back three. Shades of how it went with Piergianni towards the end… I wonder how he’s doing now? Hogan was as bad as anyone Saturday and a team that keeps falling apart should have it's Captain questioned in my opinion. I understand your point though, on the left side of a back two or even three he's the only centrehalf we have comfortable on the left, I just don't like McGhaey there and Suttons untested. I'm shocked we've not played a 4-5-1 or 4-3-3 under Mellon, personally I'd go with; Hudson Sutton Raglan Hogan Kitching Atherton Gardner Conlon Sheron Walker Norwood or Fondop or Garner I know some will crab playing a kid but he's got to be worth a chance given he is the only player we can turn to who can turn a defence. We can't continue to play narrow and through the middle surely?, since Green has gone we've looked devoid of anything going forward and that in itself tells you where our issues are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 4 hours ago, BP1960 said: It's difficult I know but maybe 442 attacking; Instructions, compete, pass, move, create, score goals. Hudson Sachdev Sutton Raglan or Hobson Kitching Atherton Gardner Conlon Walker Fondop Garner or Norwood. I would certainly give that line-up/formation a try. Pace and experience. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcmetty Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 3 hours ago, Wardie said: I would certainly give that line-up/formation a try. Pace and experience. We aiming for <20% possession? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 hour ago, oafcmetty said: We aiming for <20% possession? Can't be any worse than the stats from Saturday, can it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythemostimportantkick Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 No word on when this is rearranged for ? Apologies if I’ve missed it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Sinnott Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 20 minutes ago, simplythemostimportantkick said: No word on when this is rearranged for ? Apologies if I’ve missed it. Think it might end up being after the Oxford match... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsslatic Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 It can only be the 9th or 16th can't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.